I guess it depends on your answer to the following questions.
Is Chess a sport? Go? Scrabble? Poker?
None of those require any physical skill but do require a substantial amount of mental and psychological skill to compete at top levels.
If you’re actually comparing time spent in the sport, then it’s a very interesting argument in favor of e-sports. US football is only about 10% actual sport, the rest is posturing, cheerleaders and commercials. I mean, you could watch an entire game in 15 minutes. Baseball isn’t much better. Soccer (or actual football) is at the top, naturally. Hockey – my favorite sport – isn’t too far behind.
E-sports are more akin to baseball, in that there isn’t a time for the game, so much an end goal. It could be edge of your seat for 30 straight minutes, or it could be junk for everything but a few rushes. The quality of the match depends largely on the ruleset, the game being played and the skill level of the players (both reflexes and the meta).
I’ve watched a couple SC2 matches and while there’s less action than a MOBA or FPS, the strategy application in that game is impressive. Macro and micro management is a very hard skill set to refine and does pay dividends after the competitive arena is closed.
While there’s certain financial benefits to pro sports as we normally see them, it’s hard to translate a good basketball skill set to another field. Leading a raid, playing ladder ranks or hitting the stage in a MOBA final seems to me, to have a larger real-world cross skill impact than a physical sport. Maybe that’s some compensation for the lack of money in field. For comparison, in my super lack of depth google search, Messi makes more than all e-sport purses in a year combined.
Still, e-sports are a rather young field and with more time and a larger pool of players, I think there’s a pretty interesting future in line. I’d certainly like to see more of the “thinking person’s” games available.
Tennis might be a better analogy. No doubt about it being a sport, it is ranked one-on-one play, it is focused on a “win” goal, and a match isn’t the three hour investment that so many professional sports require.
Also, somebody wants a word with you…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know it’s a geek thing when people argue about grammar.
Tennis is crazy. I watched a fair part of that 11 hour marathon at Wimbleton a few years back. Solid comparison though, since you can have some marathon LoL matches too.
Yeah, that tweet then started a fight between those who write it “esports” and those who insist on “eSports” for the term. I think they later joined ranks to go deface the Wikipedia page on the topic, which has the title “electronic sports.”
Yes. A sport is nothing more than a highly organized form of leisure, typically but not exclusively requiring some degree of physical activity.
Hmm all the examples mentioned in the beginning of the post share the trait that there is no physical “skill” required. As far as I am aware most (all??) esports are in games that function in realtime demanding some amount of physical skill of the player, like twitch play, commands per minute, etc. Might be me on a limb, but couldn’t this be why we call them sports, whereas we do not call chess even when performed at a master lvl with tournaments, etc for sports.
The “thinking persons games” seem to lack this physical skill, and that could be a reason not to call them esports. We could still have more tournaments in them though 🙂
Competition then? Like darts?