I am a very large fan of ancient history and in particular the bronze age. That covers 3300BC to about 1200BC. This is the age of myth, with very little writing, as that came mostly in the iron age. What we know if that time is quite limited, and what is written is often written centuries after occurring. It was a time of gods.
The Odyssey is a great example of this. What we know of it is generally attributed to Homer (800BC) about an event that happened a heck of a long time before (1200BC). Think about that for a second. If I asked you to talk about a story that happened in the year 1600, but gave you no books and only people to explain it, what would you actually understand? Heck, even Homer was an oral poet (as he was blind), so the written versions are solely interpretations, many years later.
The Odyssey is not a factual retelling of actual events. There is no proof that there was a Trojan Horse – in fact it’s barely mentioned at all in this story, and what we know of it came from the Aeneid written by Virgil in about 30BC. That’s 800 years after the story was told, and 1200 years after the actual even took place.
What the Odyssey is, is a story. A story meant to convey the storyteller’s principles and values in an entertaining medium. We experience that daily today. A thousand years ago, theatre and books. Two thousand years ago? Three? This story is thematic, and nearly all adventures today replicate the structure of a nearly 3,000 year old tale. It is enduring and impactful.
In the past 100 years there have been nearly a dozen retellings of this story in film & TV. I can still remember the version with Armand Assante, where he basically had sex with everyone on his journey. The most recent interpretation from Chris Nolan is in theatres now, and I did have the chance to see it in IMAX. I have thoughts.
First, and importantly in all Nolan films, is the artistic elements. There’s very little CG anywhere, which is frankly mind-boggling when you think of the scale of things. The sound and picture framing are simply ridiculous, it’s a purposeful loudness and structure. Truly this can only be fully appreciated in IMAX – the environment and presentation is so important. Don’t watch this on a phone! As is often with Nolan, the narrative structure is broken and non-linear. By seeing Odysseus at multiple simultaneous points in his journey, you can better appreciate his growth. There isn’t much artistic liberty taken in the story, as the main beats are hit in the order they normally are, and the themes all remain in various formats. There is liberty in the cast and weighting of the various themes, but that’s the point – I’d watch another version or read a book if I wanted something done before.
What I did enjoy in this interpretation was the weight applied to humanity. There is no direct involvement of any Greek god here, simply the fall out of prior items. The Cyclops (which is wildly impressive) is present and is still Poseidon’s child, but Poseidon himself is not here. The journey of Odysseus through all of these events therefore is a human burden, and the growing realization of the impacts of his decisions. What may have seemed small is in fact epic in scope. The journey in the literal sense is also figurative – that’s why we have the word odyssey after all.
The net result is that this film is an event. Event with a capital E. Whether you enjoy it or not, there’s a likely line in the sand of ‘did you see this or not’, similar to things like The Matrix. Go see it!
