There is a very wide continuum between trend setting and trend chasing. In both cases, people will look at you weird.

Trend setters are on the edge of greatness, a particular idea that has great potential, but struggling with the clear execution. They are first out of the gate, and may get credit, but it’s those just behind them that have the opportunity to learn, correct, and improve. Meridian59, Ultima Online, Everquest, and World of Warcraft fit into that model, each larger than the last.

Trend chasers are those that are late to the party and don’t quite understand why everyone is dressed in red. They then show up in red at the next party when everyone is now in blue. This is the group that only see the what and doesn’t understand the why. They may personally experience joy in the consumption of the thing, but don’t quite digest exactly why that is. I could list a dozen themepark MMOs here, but without question Wildstar is one of the best examples.

As with most trends, time is short and fickle. MOBAs are done. Auto-battlers had like 5 minutes of fame. Puzzlers are extremely rare. A small group of developers who are agile can get something decent out the door, with low overhead and some potential decent returns. A large corporation may take 4 years to get something out, by which time it’s simply too late.

I’ll pick on Anthem here for a minute, because damn, astoundingly poor leadership killed that game. The why of the co-op shooter genre should not be hard to digest. Surmounting increasingly difficult challenges as a group of people, and receiving incremental rewards hits just the right spot in the back of the brain. I get better because we get better because I get better. The why isn’t what killed Anthem. The how killed Anthem. Bugs aside (and were there ever bugs), the mechanics of group play were generally broken as the “door to entry” wasn’t tested. Individual progressing was in line with Diablo 3 at launch, meaning dozens of hours of absolute garbage for a miniscule % increment. At launch, more time was spent promoting cosmetics that addressing shortcomings. Had they paused for a year, and addressed the absolute obvious issues, I’d wager we’d still be playing Anthem today!

Today’s corporate drug of choice is live services. The need to have multiplayer content that is subsidized through micro-transactions that are time-gated. Battle passes are one thing (which makes money off FOMO), but the sheer concepts behind them that if you build it, they will pay money, is just mind blowing. I mean, I get it. Live Service games were a huge lifeline during the pandemic to keep social bonds. We are not in a pandemic, we are in a near global recession, where money spent in one place cannot be spent elsewhere. The conversation of “value vs. money vs. time” is now top of mind, and as more options are on the market, the choice of said value is multiple.

So, if I have the choice of spending $70 on say, “Skull and Bones” or “Suicide Squad”, I am in fact comparing those games to every other coop looter/shooter live service game. This is no different than Warhammer Online launching after World of Warcraft, with worse quests, more bugs, worse graphics, and poorer social tools. Or, as above, Wildstar launching with no social tools and only hardcore content. Do you understand the market segment? You’re late to the party, so you need to show up with near-perfection.

Will these games kill live service offerings? Not a chance, they are the model for today’s microtransactions and the lifeline when games cost more than $100m to develop. And honestly, live service can work! Do they remind developers that they actually need a GOOD GAME for folks to want to spend their money and stick around? That is also unlikely, at least at a large scale when you have accountants at the game development table. If it’s a good idea, and it’s well executed, people will want to play it and want to pay you for it. You can make more money with decent marketing and thoughts about monetization, but that’s after you have a good game, not before. You shouldn’t have a game mechanic that is designed to extract maximum $$$ from players (*cough* lootboxes *cough*).

Now, do I think this is the start of the end of major studios dominating the gaming space? I would wager a yes on that. Game development is democratized and has a very low barrier to entry now (Valheim had like 3 developers). The lack of quality for AAA games, combined with real world financial pressures is making people pay more attention to where to spend $70 a go. Embracer Group may be the best example of why consolidation for assets is not such a great idea if you are the asset.

In that vein, I remain optimistic about the gaming industry. Great developers are out there with amazing ideas. Navigating the chaos of the boardrooms has become unattractive, so let’s see what the new model looks like.

Of note, the first large patch was released recently, which was more in the “this is obviously broken” than anything truly balance related. There are still some fairly large outliers.

Where Enshrouded starts as most survival games (punch a tree, kick a rock, build a hut), it quickly takes a turn out of the natural punishment of the genre, and instead focus on exploration. Probably best viewed as an action-RPG with survival elements. What I mean by that is that the risk / reward mechanisms skew much more to the latter. There’s no perma-death, no item loss, things never get destroyed, your death leaves you with all your armor/weapons, and teleportation has very minor limitations. Compared to Valheim where death causes skill loss, all items are dropped, and you can’t teleport metals… well this is easy as cake.

Some general tips however can save some time and help guide the more confusing parts of the game:

• There is an absolutely massive balance issue between ranged attacks and melee. Wands are what combat should be, the rest feels under-balanced.
• Magic attacks are strong but initially require “charges”, which you need to craft. Eternal Ice (no charges, more mana use, less damage) is unlocked through a quest, other Eternal spells come through exploration of new material. Eternal Acid Bite = insanely strong, but you won’t see it til very late.
• NPCs can craft armor and very weak weapons. Open chests to find new weapons. Chests respawn when you reload the world.
• Flame altars are cheap to build (5 stone), provide free teleportation, and a respawn point. Use them, especially near higher points where you can glide.
• Armor stats are broken, except +dmg, +hp, +mana. Rings generally don’t work.
• Levels (25 max) matter due to skill points, and progress is extremely slow until the teens. 
• For skills, Double Jump is mandatory. Water Aura (and INT) are currently the meta, and negate most healing requirements. Resetting skills costs 10 runes, which is pretty much free.
• Bow users need to craft arrows. The material costs are high and long to acquire. Feathers in particular cannot be found without killing birds… very frustrating, and less damage than a wand.
• A roof, walls, fire and place to sit provided a Rested buff, which increases stamina. You lose it when you die. Try to always have it active.
• Comfort level extends the duration of Rested. No real need to invest here that much as the material requirements are kind of high.
• Berries are a great healing option til the mid point of the game. Bandages are ok.
• Collect the 5 NPCs as a priority. They provide quests (they are the breadcrumbs for progress) and unlocks that make a massive difference in options.
• Clearing “Wells” outside of the starter quest is mostly optional. It does provide a skill point, but can be quite challenging until you’re about level 15. Shroud Roots (hit with an axe) provide the same skill point and no real challenge.
• You will need a lot of water. A lot. Collect it when you can, and build a well when you have the option.
• You will never have too much Flax. Quite ridiculous in point of fact.
• The rake is OP. Use it to create level surfaces anywhere (better than a pickaxe). Use it to “extend” farm soil for free – then use a pickaxe to collect the free soil!
• Food buffs are “meh” for most of the game. The top tier ones give +5 to a stat but require complex materials and go away when you die.
• Upgrade the Flame Power (the middle option) as that allows you to enter more dangerous shroud (red), and create more portals (up to 8), plus gives attribute points. The final piece for each upgrade is tied to an NPC quest to kill a boss. If you’ve got the final piece, then upgrading is now the #1 priority.
• Keep your first base, it has trees, berries, nearby water, shroud material, flintstone, and clay. There’s no good reason to move it aside from aesthetics. Which of course, matter later! (I moved to Fort Kelvin, looks cool)
• There are 5 large beacon towers (you can see them clearly). Unlock them quickly, as they open the larger map and allow teleports. Gliding from a tower = very fast travel.
• The basic gilder + hook should be built ASAP. The next glider upgrade is very useful. The 3rd is not, because the 4th glider is in a chest in the south end of the map and comes around at pretty much the same time. (Updraft skill is moderately useful, but can only be used once per glide. If you could use it multiple times, it would skyrocket in value.)
• Carry at least 5 lockpicks at all times.
• You’re going to need a lot of storage. Magic Chests allow NPCs to craft from chests (not stations), but the costs are quite high to make them until later in the game. 
• There are a LOT of materials in this game. Every time you see something new, chop or chip it to see what it may give, especially in Shroud areas. 
• Most crafting options only unlock if you harvest the material, not if you find it in a pot/chest/ground. 
• There are 6 bosses:
  • Thunderbrute: avoid standing directly in front of them. Can find them in pairs.
  • Matron: Dodge to avoid the poison throw, which may 1-shot you. Usually fought in tight quarters and the primary example why melee is broken in this game.
  • Brawler: If you are too far out of range, they will jump, stomp the ground, and 1 shot you.
  • Wispwyvern: Strafe until it takes a deep breath, shoot an arrow to stun it, then attack. Insects will attack you at the same time. Thankfully only 1 of these.
  • Monstrosity: Always found in the Shroud, shoots projectiles in front for low-ish damage. Didn’t even realize this was a boss.
  • Sicklescythe: Floating death. Dodge forward to avoid the sickle projectiles, and run like hell when they do their AE charge attack. Even at max level, with the best gear, you will die to these.

I would personally consider the game “complete” when you acquire the final glider, as pretty much everything past that point is cosmetic.

I get that many people will be comparing Enshrouded to Valheim. Sure, they have survival mechanics and base building, but that’s about as fair as comparing Valheim to Minecraft. Enshrouded has way more in common with Return to Moria. I’m just happy the genre is exploring non-PvP options and we are able to see some really amazing results from some small/mid-sized developers. It’s much more than punching trees.

Ubisoft has some rather serious internal issues to resolve. Similar to many large AAA studios, they have been chasing trends rather than focusing on quality. No one, and I mean no one, outside of a board position would think that NFTs are a worthwhile investment at scale. If the focus is chasing trends, then what are you really doing?

The recent Prince of Persia game is an unfortunate example of this. Metroidvanias are “in”, so much so that the concepts themselves are simple enough to understand, should have a relatively “low” development cost, and are generally easy to digest by the solo gaming masses. But if you don’t understand why the genre is popular and you’re simply mimicking others, then you need to hit that thing out of the damn park! Charging AAA prices for something that is less than other smaller shops have done is insanity. Now, for a smaller shop selling 300k and making $15m would be amazing. For Ubisoft…I saw the credits roll at the end, there were a lot of people involved and this wasn’t a weekend’s effort. Would it have sold more copies at a different price point? That’s a marketing question, but a $70 entry fee when there’s a literal glut of great games out there seems an odd choice – and I won’t open up the subscription convo here.

Anyone recall the Avatar game that launched before the holidays? It was supposed to launch next to the movie, but was delayed. Next film isn’t out til 2025, so that’s a heck of a no-man’s land. No real marketing push, the game is decent (from what I hear, but I’m not paying $70 for it) and most certainly won’t make it’s money back.

For a long time, it was a developers market. It was certainly shareware city in the 90s (and virus city I guess), but the 00’s to 10’s centralized development into mega studios. For every Horizon Zero Dawn, Steam will see 20,000 games come out – admittedly of middling quality. Big studios have some existential questions facing them. It simply is not sustainable to ask 200 people to spend 5 years building something and think that’s a realistic investment. Nor would it seem like industry wants to continue that path. Quite an interesting pivot ahead.

To the surprise of absolutely no one, Microsoft cut 1900 employees following their deal close out for Activision/Blizzard. Bobby Kotick got a nice sunset paycheck reward as a result, and Ybarra was shown the door. It’s simply continual sad news to be in game development these past few years, mostly because the price to entry and return on investment math is long gone (like the themepark MMO rush of the mid 00s). Blizzard in particular has simply been unable to right the ship of poor investment decisions that don’t have the word “battle pass” attached.

I want to pick on a particular thread in this larger convo though, and that’s specifically on survival game that’s been in dev for 6+ years – Odyssey. The math on this is simply mind boggling… and a testament to both the deep pockets and sheer madness of game development today. Tangent first:

Survival games are by their very nature, niche. And I say that in the context of a AAA game shop, where 1 million players is niche compared to things like Call of Duty. PvP games in this setting are popular yet struggle with tremendous griefing (try Rust for a week, let me know how that goes). PvE game are a rare event that can truly capture attention for more than a few weeks without procedurally generated content (Palworld and Enshrouded attention spans will be interesting.)

Minecraft is the absolute perfect example. Designed by a very small team with a fixed vision, it truly launched the survival wave with simple voxel mechanics and procedurally generated environments. Content was added over time, for FREE, and the game made mint. So much so, that Microsoft bought them, and has made every attempt under the sun to further monetize the game (Realms has had moderate success as a server hosting option, Dungeons and Legends failed big time). Taking the “big corporate” view on Minecraft simply has not worked.

In that vein, Blizzard’s seeming game direction was to not use an industry tool, but an in-house mobile variant to support 100 players simultaneously. Make it big and maintain the boil the ocean approach of “when it’s ready”. Throw a ton of developers on it, and invest a lot of capital. Which is truly a quite fascinating approach for a company who has struggled for decades to launch any new IP outside of Overwatch.

Reports internally were that the dev team was relatively enthused by the potential, but hamstrung by the executive choice of dev engine. Morale-wise, that’s got to be a hell of a slog. I’ve harped enough about the glory days of game dev, and rose colored glasses abound. There’s a larger reckoning underway in the games industry, where the ideas are less important that the boards. The democratization of development is making AAA game studios seem more and more irrelevant. And the kids’ dream of being a game developer has become even less clear than before.

I have a soft spot for metroidvanias. It’s a genre that seems to scratch many itches at once, and the floor to entry is rather low in terms of development. They can be taken in bite size chunks, can have varying levels of difficulty, typically have some interesting storyline, and the branching paths make for some interesting options. Hollow Knight, Ori, and Blasphemous still sit way atop for me, though there are many others close by, like Bloodstained. Heck, Dead Cells has a good foothold in the genre too!

The recent Price of Persia game is a full on reboot of the series and most closely emulates the Hollow Knight attempt at the genre, to varying degrees. About 15 hours or so to get through for the basics, 20 if you want to reach closer to 100% (which I do not recommend).

The map is absolutely sprawling, with most branches relating to trap traversal, followed by backdoors to skip it in the future. You have a core melee attack, a limited range option, and then “magic” of sorts. You have amulets that provide passive skill buffs, which you are limited to equip. Movement traversal skills (like double jump) come after key boss fights. There are side quests, health boosts, upgrades from materials and so on. Those are the pieces of a metroidvania, it would not be one without.

Should I talk about the ability to take pictures of the map? This is neat but not groundbreaking… every metroidvania has had the ability to mark the map with specific icons. Guess I’m just not getting it.

The heart of a metroidvania is more than the pieces, but how they connect. And the true heart of a metroidvania is in the fluidity, the balance between combat and movement. Hollow Knight is a gold standard for a reason, it nails this absolutely perfectly. Blasphemous 1 went a bit too much into combat, an issue admirably resolved in the sequel. PoP struggles in this area due to design choices. By the time you’ve acquired every movement power, the fluidity is there as you can quickly zip across the map and avoid tough enemies or plow through simple ones. But that’s truly the last hour or so of gameplay, with 20 prior being a relative slog of imprecise controls.

I mentioned that most of the game relates to trap traversal, which is not a bad thing in itself. Platforming can be fun, if the tools are there to help. Sadly, I have been spoiled with games like Celeste. PoP doesn’t have fixed camera angles, it zooms in and out depending on the map, which messes with visual cues. Second, it has imperfect pixel placement, so that a jump done once will work, but done the same way a second time will not (this is exacerbated in the late quest “Impossible Climb”). I completed all the challenges, and the wide majority on the first go, but it’s clear that there are issues here. And hats off to the developers on this… they added an accessibility feature that allows you to skip all “normal” trap traversals. This is a massive sanity check near the tail end of the game.

I’ll also pick on the magic system for a bit, because it’s interesting in concept and flawed in execution. You have a magic source – athra – that fills up a bar up to 3 levels. You have about a dozen skills to choose from that empty 1 to 3 bars and either deal damage (11 of them) or heal you (costs 2 bars). You can only slot 2 of them at any time. For most players, one of those will always be the healing option as healing alternatives are quite low in the game and damage comes from everywhere. So you effectively have 1 skill to chose from and generally want to keep close to 2 bars ready for a heal. Athra gains are slow, you may fill up 3 bars total in a boss fight. Which in practical terms, means you’re only going to use a simple melee attack (as it’s the only consistent damage source) and never a tier 3 option, which effectively wastes an entire game system. Sure, you can supplement magic moves through amulets, but those are best reserved for melee augments.

A quick note on the parry mechanic which is becoming more and more popular. It’s here, there’s a visual queue for what can be parried or not, and is a great option for bosses. Miss the timing and you take extra damage. It works great in 1v1 battles, and horrendously in group settings, which is fine by me.

Bosses and mini-bosses are a highlight. The fights are well structured, reward memorization, and with a single exception, avoid super cheese. I’d have liked more of them to break up the exploration portions, especially the middle part of the game (turn on Guided mode, trust me). Everyone has multiple stages, and the final fight feels like it will never end. Quite well done.

There’s one movement skill that’s interesting, a sort of timewarp where you leave an impression and can zoom back to it on command. It’s never used in standard combat, a few odd times in optional trap levels, a lot in the optional puzzle rooms. It can be great for some boss fights, if you put is somewhere “safe” and want to avoid an AE attack. Cool idea.

The “extras” are odd here. There’s a few quests, nothing too ornery (the bird one was bugged and could not complete). There are some “hidden” puzzles for you to figure out, which was fun. Also some optional trap traversal areas. Combined, they reward you with partial hearts (yay!), amulets & slots (cool!), ore to upgrade weapons (yes!), gems to buy stuff and coins to upgrade amulets (YMMV). So you’re going to want to do most of these, with the exception of the extra coins. See, you can upgrade every amulet twice, the first time for gems, the second for gems + 1 coin. There are 37 amulets, you’re going to upgrade maybe 6 of them.

Notice how I haven’t talked about the story or lore? Yeah, well, there’s not much there. There are 50 odd lore objects that provide near zero added context. Persian mythology is ripe for options here, lost opportunity.

While PoP is a good metroidvania, it doesn’t dethrone any of the pantheon. I am not a fan of the AAA pricing on this game, not when there are dozens and dozens of frankly better metroidvanias you can get for less than half the price. The great news is that the demo should still be available – give that a shot as it’s a pretty good approximation of the mid-point of the game.

The most impressive part of any factory production game is the rhythm. You are just barely getting anything going, and then boom, a near perfect production chain just works and you can watch it run its magic. It’s like if each factory had it’s own voice, and you could see them sing. Ok, maybe that’s just me?

Following that analogy, each piece of the factory has it’s own specific sound, and when you can get enough of those voices working together, it’s extremely impressive to watch. To point, entering the late game means warpers, which require green science (Gravity Matrix). Each one of these requires over 120 pieces of something collected, which are processed at just under 20 different stations. Which if we’re talking main production lines, is going to be about half of a given factory. So half of everything you own is going to have a part in building this 1 thing. And by the time you reach end game, you’ll be producing a few hundred of these per minute. 

All that to say you’re going to be running rather impressive production chains across multiple planets, and the need to harvest from many locations.

Ground Stuff

The last post talked about ground bases, which in truth are rather simple to manage. 8 Missile Turrets with pretty much anything in them will destroy any base that has a Signal Tower close by. The only issue is that the Dark Fog will continually create NEW bases, which are all but impossible to defend against given the power/material requirements to fully protect a planet. This needs a rather significant balance pass.

Space Stuff

A disclaimer that the devs have stated that the space portion is not complete, and space stations should be coming.

The first post mentioned that you should not attack space relays (the thing in the sky connected to ground bases) because that turns the space fleet against you. This remains true for the duration of the game, as even if you had 50 turrets on the planet, they’d take a whooping from any space attack… that means battlebases to keep them all repaired, which is more wasted energy.

And currently, there are no star system based options for attacking space fleets, aside from you piloting up there with some smaller ships. Which has the following issues:

• The size of the fleet (# of ships) is very limited until the late game due to research requirements. Even at late game, with ALL upgrades, you are going to blow through 500+ ships to take out any hive above level 5.
• The ships themselves require a significant amount of resources to craft, which are not available in bulk until well into the late game.
• The power/durability/attack speed of the ships is dependent on a rather substantial amount of research.
• Your own power levels continually decrease while your ships attack, meaning you need late game upgrades to power levels/charging/deuterium rods

Even at end game research levels (e.g. all “colored” research complete), you will go through a double stack of space ships to take out even a level 1 space base. Which you will be required to do as the Dark Fog is continually sending “seeds” into star systems to generate space bases, which you cannot defend against.

Sulfuric Acid + Unipolar Magnets

These two items are only available in late game star systems, which prior to Dark Fog wasn’t much of an issue. The Sulfuric Acid is available in infinite supply (and essential to alleviate some oil production chain issues), and will generate a bottle neck in the late game. Unipolar Magnets are a very limited supply, and only used in end game.

By the time you unlock the ability to find these items, those systems will have Dark Fog present, with multiple ground bases and a space base. To actually clear all this out, you need a Missile Turret blueprint (6 or more turrets, a storage container, a signal tower, and belts to feed it all) and some really basic power generation. Take out one base, install a thermal plant for a new power source, and move the turrets next to it, and a space station to ship extra missiles. This should allow you to install mining equipment, put a signal tower to defend it, a battlestation base to repair any damage, and harvest all you need. A sort of back door harvest I guess. 

Overall Thoughts

I think this is a great first pass at scalable enemy AI. They are logical, the threat levels are manageable, and the attack patterns are defensible. I never felt like I was fighting an exponential curve that required diverting too much material. But I’ve also played this game for 200+ hours and know how to optimize. I also didn’t generate a space attack until I was ready. No joke, a space base attacking your planet before late game will pretty much mean a full restart, it is that strong. 

The ground portion generally works, though the material provided from combat is clearly just placeholder for now. It makes no sense to “farm” ground bases for material at this point. But it generally works. I don’t quite understand why you’d run laser towers, or cannons though, as missile turrets are infinitely better in absolutely all cases. New power distribution options will be required to support planetary shields as well, as this is the first time you truly need to use the entire planet’s surface (space stations?) And there are simply too many things to build on the ground to have true value (laser turrets are a great example)

The space to ground portion is not yet balanced. Protecting a planet from new bases requires too much power and at the absolute most optimal 10 towers (connected with 100+ poles), which makes no sense before end game. Having the ability to have orbiting space stations may do the trick. It really changes the end-game portion to wars of attrition, which I don’t find terribly interesting.

Net result is that the initial star system is cleared of Dark Fog, and 2 others (to get all the rare material). Those last 2 were multiple attack runs with nearly 600 ships destroyed. And now, every 30 minutes or so, a new attack happens in those systems because it’s not possible to protect a system, only a planet. So, play session complete until the space portion is in.

Smallish update here. I’m learning the AI behavior a bit more here, in particular around aggressiveness. In particular around the planetary bases.

• Get Missile Towers. That’s steps 1, 2 & 3.
• Destroying a base and NOT filling in the “hole” means you’ll see a new base in about 60 seconds.
• It takes a little less than 10 minutes for a base to construct fighters
• The attack wave progression has a linear linkage to power generation. You make more power, they become tremendously more aggressive. At mid-game, this could mean an attack wave every 30 seconds.
• The enemy will continuously try to create bases on the planets in a system. 3 seems to be the main goal to run at any given time.
• Letting the enemy dig bases and filling with a geothermal plant = ~310% efficiency, and a relatively small footprint. It’s a decent boost in the early game.
• Enemy waves drop random items, at volumes that are relatively meaningless aside from inventory hassle. And they can drop any base items (there’s like 20 of them), that you’d need to build a sorting chain to manage. I am hopeful this is a placeholder for something else.
• The space hive doesn’t get angry or attack you, even with interplanetary towers. The next step is to see what happens when I deploy warpers.
• Defending planets from random base construction is an interesting feat. I don’t think the game does a good job explaining how to get there, at least in a practical sense. If you’re on planet #2 and planet #3 all of a sudden has an imminent attack, you are not going to get there in time. And my planet #3 is a production hub, meaning half of it has stuff on it, making it quite important to stay “up”.
• Oh, planetary shields are worth a mention. While they are listed as a mid-game item, the material/power to make/run them is actually late game. And you need 80(!!!) to fully protect a planet. I am clearly missing a key piece of info here.

In terms of quality of life here, the added materials/products that were released with this add a substantial amount of complexity to builds. Not that I’m advocating for a single simple bus to build every end-state item, but at the same time it shouldn’t require massive spaghetti farms. The saving grace for this challenge are Logistic Distributors+ Logistic Bots.

These little doodads sit on top of storage containers and ship items between them. They don’t move huge amounts of items, but for a production bus they do wonders. It allows you to construct base materials in one area, and ship a few around the map to another container. So if you need to inject a single item within a bus, it works great! If you want to produce material around a planet, then you can centrally store it too. It doesn’t really work if you are producing multiple items (say 6 assemblers making the same thing) as the volume is too low. And the initial versions have a limited range, which can be upgraded to a decent place by mid-game. By the time you get to planet-level production, it’s simply required, and you need the upgrades to increase their range.

I’m nearing the warp phase of the game now, which I consider late game. Getting rare resources has a huge impact on simplifying production chains – especially the oil ones. Oh, how the oil ones are painful.

Again, if you don’t own Dyson Sphere Project, you really should be picking it up. Or, don’t, and then you won’t have a bar set so high to disappoint with other games! I’ve completed it a half dozen times now, its really that good.

For the last year or so, the devs have been trying to add PvE content into a procedurally generated 3D game, in a similar vein to Factorio. (There have been a pile of QoL patches along the way, the game is way more intuitive now.) This has been labelled Dark Fog, and came out in early December. I’ve waited a few weeks because a) Steam Sale!!! and b) bug fixes always come after major content. Smart move, let me tell you.

The concept of Dark Fog is actually quite simple in theory, but amazingly complex in practice. In your starting area, the enemy has a starting base on your planet and one in space, with a few more planet-based bases in the system. You don’t have the ability to view other systems, but they are also infected to a degree. Now, the kicker here is that the enemy itself adapts to your progression, and increases its threat based on a set of variables – for the start, it’s power generation. It progressively increases its attacks until you can build enough strength to wipe it out. Which, as a progressively challenging enemy, becomes progressively more difficult to achieve.

In order to defend against these enemies and conversely counterattack, you are giving new items to research (approx 20% more “things”). If you are familiar with that concept, anytime to add a “thing” to a production chain, you are effectively adding a multiplicative factor of complexity. I’m not terribly far into that path now, just started the 3rd research tier, but I’d easily say it’s added what amounts to a sub-game to my regular path, or for those older-school folks, this is a large expansion of content rather than simply DLC. 

In practical terms, this means that not only is the main bus longer, but you’ll need to protect the bus from attack, effectively building defensive walls around it. That’s simple! (says you), until you realize that building the wall needs material to construct, material to continually arm, and importantly, precious power to keep active. The secret sauce here is the Signal Tower, which acts as a planet-wide extender for your relatively short-range missile towers. You’ll need at least 5 missile launchers + enough signal towers to destroy an enemy base, and then you’ll need a geothermal plant (which is mid-tier tech), in order to prevent future incursions. It’s a relatively complicated dance to learn at the start.

Swapping to other planets, you’ll have 3 or more bases to destroy, using a similar setup. Build a missile factory (iron, copper, coal), build a dozen or so missile towers, and extend your Signal Tower network until you take out the base. The higher rank those bases, the more missiles you will need, but more an issue of scale.

And that’s just the planetary portion. The space/hive portion is even more complicated as these bases you’re destroying are feeding an ever growing space fleet. Which effectively puts you against the clock to a) build up enough defensive power to survive, b) build enough offensive power to destroy it and c) not tick them off by accident (don’t attack relays!!) And even the smallest of space ships is the equivalent of 5 planet bases, so you don’t really want any fleet attacks.

My current run is about the mid-way mark, where I’ve cleared out 2 of the 3 planet’s bases, and I’m about to install a interplanetary logistics hub (to get silicon & titanium to my home planet). The steps that follows generally go:

• Clear out planet #3.
• Build a power generation hub with solar panels + batteries (in this case, that’s planet #2)
• Build gas planet harvesters (40)
• Build a Deuterium harvest cycle (planet #2)
• Start terraforming planet #3 to build a planet-wide construction hub.
• Transfer production from planet #1 to planet #3
• Get purple cubes
• Scale up production hub
• Explore other systems for raw / rare materials
• Build Dyson Sphere frame
• Get green cubes
• Fill in Dyson Sphere frame
• Collect solar power
• Final planet scaling
• Get white cubes
• Win!

Somewhere in that, I’ll need to figure out the math for a planetary defensive shield + attack base. I’ll reserve some thoughts for when I hit the later portions of the game, in regards to speed, complexity and difficulty.